Assessment
A confidential workflow and infrastructure review. Output: a written architectural recommendation, sizing, isolation posture and a deployment roadmap. Delivered whether or not the engagement continues.
Review assessment scopeA boutique practice that designs and deploys private AI infrastructure inside the client perimeter engineered for organisations operating under regulatory, contractual or data-residency constraints. Inference, retrieval and workflow remain under the client's control: auditable, vendor-independent, and aligned with the governance posture the organisation already operates under.
A confidential workflow and infrastructure review. Output: a written architectural recommendation, sizing, isolation posture and a deployment roadmap. Delivered whether or not the engagement continues.
Review assessment scopeTurn-key delivery of a sovereign AI environment inside the client perimeter inference, retrieval over the internal corpus, network isolation, and operator handover. Typical timeline: one to two weeks from kick-off to operational use.
Review deployment scopeContinuous lifecycle management under a defined SLA: model updates, corpus ingestion, monitoring, and governance reporting. A monthly review keeps the environment aligned with how the organisation actually uses it.
Review operations scopeEngagements that extend beyond the assistant internal document pipelines, line-of-business integrations, knowledge-graded interfaces. Fixed scope, fixed price, fixed timeline.
Review bespoke engagementsThe practice operates exclusively with organisations under regulatory or contractual sensitivity legal, healthcare, finance, logistics, manufacturing. Questions around privilege, retention, jurisdiction, GDPR Article 28/32 and sector-specific governance are answered directly, without the translation tax of a generalist consultancy.
Engagements are scoped in writing before they begin. No open-ended hourly billing, no drift. If a requirement falls outside the agreed architecture, the practice surfaces it before the engagement starts.
Every environment is built on an open-architecture stack, owned and operated inside the client perimeter. The client retains the ability to operate, modify or transfer the system without dependency on the practice, on a single model provider, or on an external inference platform.
Engagements are led end-to-end by the principal, Nikita Chetverikov scoping, architecture, deployment, governance handover. No account layer, no junior delivery. Decisions reach the buyer in hours, not weeks.
A twelve-attorney firm required AI-assisted analysis of NDAs, MSAs, DPAs, engagement letters, motions and discovery materials but could not route client-confidential text through a public model provider without breaching privilege. A sovereign inference environment was deployed inside the firm's perimeter, with retrieval over the document corpus and isolation at the network layer. Attorney-client privilege intact, response-time SLA honoured, drafting and review cycles materially compressed.
Read the full law-firm RAG case study →A private clinic required two capabilities: structured transcription of doctor–patient consultations into form-025/u records with ICD-10 coding, and a patient intake interface that captures symptoms and pre-visit context. Both run on infrastructure inside the clinic perimeter; no patient data leaves the building.
See the clinic NER deployment notes →A university research group required ChatGPT-grade assistance over grant proposals, unpublished datasets and student records. Cloud assistants created a GDPR/FERPA exposure the DPO could not sign off. A sovereign inference environment was deployed inside the campus perimeter in fourteen days, with retrieval over the lab share, network isolation and DPIA-ready audit logging. Zero cloud calls leaving campus.
Read the 14-day research-lab rollout notes →Note - reference engagements are described with engagement-permissible detail. Quantitative outcomes vary per environment; figures shown are derived from comparable deployments and the practice's internal benchmarks. Engagement-specific scoping precedes any quantitative commitment. Discuss an engagement.
A confidential review of the organisation, the workflow, and the regulatory posture to confirm whether sovereign AI is the appropriate response.
Workflow review, infrastructure sizing, architectural recommendation, written roadmap. Credited against the deployment engagement.
Provisioning, isolation, document ingestion, knowledge transfer. The environment enters operational use within the same week.
Continuous model lifecycle management, monitoring, and governance reporting under a defined SLA.
Describe the organisation, the workflows under consideration, and the constraints sensitive data cannot cross. The reply will be an honest assessment of whether sovereign AI is the appropriate response and, where it is not, a referral to a practice that is better suited.